Choosing a management style

English for Professional Purposes

Author
Affiliation

Ben Stanley

Department of Social Sciences, SWPS University

Published

September 1, 2026

For each of the cases below, you should:

Leadership styles to consider: coaching, visionary, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, commanding

Case 1: Low morale after change

A mid-sized software company has been facing increasing competitive pressures. To adapt, leadership implemented a major restructuring, including some layoffs and shifting responsibilities. While necessary, these changes have left employees across various departments feeling uncertain, anxious about their future roles, and disengaged. Team managers are noticing declining productivity and a drop in the previously positive workplace atmosphere. A specific department head is struggling to address this dip in morale and restore a sense of purpose within their team.

Case 2: The high-pressure project

A global investment firm has secured a highly sought-after client whose needs require a complex financial product to be developed and delivered within an extremely aggressive timeline. The project leader has assembled a team of the company’s top analysts, but the pressure is immense. Time is short, quality standards are non-negotiable, and any failure could jeopardise this major client relationship. The project leader needs to ensure exceptional results without risking burnout or sacrificing accuracy due to stress.

Case 3: Building a new team

A pharmaceutical company is launching a groundbreaking drug and needs a cross-functional team for a coordinated marketing and rollout strategy. Members are pulled from the marketing, sales, research, and regulatory affairs departments. These individuals are accustomed to prioritising their own departmental goals, and initial meetings have been fraught with miscommunication and conflicting perspectives. The leader of this new team needs to quickly establish trust, smooth collaboration, and ensure they’re all moving effectively towards their shared objective.

Case 4: The disruptive star

A veteran graphic designer consistently produces visually stunning, award-worthy work that consistently delights clients. However, this star employee is notoriously difficult to work with. Their perfectionist tendencies lead to dismissive and condescending attitudes towards colleagues, and they are quick to criticise others’ contributions. This behaviour has created significant tension. Their direct manager needs to address the problematic behavior while also ensuring this essential, top-performing employee doesn’t feel demoralised or targeted.

Case 5: The crisis situation

A manufacturing company has just discovered a serious safety issue with one of its most popular products. Early reports suggest the defect could potentially cause harm to consumers, though no incidents have been reported yet. Information is still emerging about the extent of the problem and its causes. The company faces decisions about potential recalls, public statements, and internal process reviews. The CEO needs to guide the organization through this crisis while balancing several urgent priorities: consumer safety, regulatory compliance, financial impact, company reputation, and employee morale.

Style Key focus Strengths Weaknesses Best used for
Visionary Inspiring with a compelling long- term vision
  • Motivates during change/uncertainty
  • Provides sense of purpose
  • Effective for major shifts
  • Lacks present-day execution focus
  • Can seem unrealistic if too lofty
  • Less effective for short-term guidance
  • New initiatives/changes
  • When clear direction is needed
  • When motivation is low
Coaching Developing individual strengths and long-term growth
  • Boosts performance and development
  • Builds loyalty and retention
  • Connects personal goals to mission
  • Time-intensive
  • Ineffective if resistance to feedback
  • Requires strong interpersonal skills
  • Developing potential
  • Addressing performance weaknesses
  • When time allows for development
Affiliative Building harmony, emotional support, team bonds
  • Heals rifts and improves morale
  • Effective during stress or crisis
  • Fosters open communication
  • May avoid confronting performance issues
  • Less effective when decisive action needed
  • Can hinder necessary criticism
  • Times of stress/crisis
  • Healing fractured teams
  • When relationships need strengthening
Democratic Collective decision-making, valuing input
  • Builds buy-in and commitment
  • Generates diverse ideas
  • Makes people feel valued
  • Time-consuming
  • Ineffective in crises
  • Can become unfocused
  • When leader needs team expertise
  • Gaining buy-in for difficult decisions
  • Building consensus on complex issues
Pacesetting Exemplary performance, high standards
  • Achieves rapid results
  • Addresses underperformance
  • Inspires excellence
  • Can lead to burnout
  • Creates stressful atmosphere
  • Risk of micromanagement
  • With highly skilled teams
  • Urgent, high-quality projects
  • Short-term demanding situations
Commanding Demanding compliance, top- down control
  • Essential in genuine crises
  • Addresses defiant behaviours
  • Useful for urgent turnarounds
  • Damages morale if used routinely
  • Reduces initiative
  • Breeds resentment
  • Genuine emergencies
  • Urgent turnaround situations
  • When immediate action is vital