Kultura organizacyjna i przywództwo

Język angielski w zastosowaniu zawodowym

Autor
Afiliacja

Ben Stanley

Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Uniwersytet SWPS

Opublikowano

25 kwietnia 2026

Part 1: Grammar — modal verbs in ethics and leadership

For each of the following scenarios, complete the sentence with an appropriate modal verb or modal verb phrase.

  1. A coaching leader wants to promote a talented but inexperienced team member to a senior role. The leader ________ provide structured mentoring to ensure the promotion succeeds.

  2. After a data breach, the company is debating whether to inform customers before completing its internal investigation. The company ________ notify affected customers without unnecessary delay.

  3. A single ethical failure at a major consultancy has destroyed client relationships built over decades. This shows how a single lapse in judgement ________ undermine years of trust.

  4. A company’s internal audit has revealed significant accounting irregularities, but the CFO insists everything is fine. The board ________ have been aware of these irregularities for some time.

  5. An internal investigation has found that a senior manager accepted undisclosed payments from a contractor. The company ________ tolerate conflicts of interest at any level of the organisation.

  6. Employees at a pharmaceutical company have raised concerns about pressure to approve drugs without adequate testing. The company ________ release products that have not completed the full safety review process.

  7. Stakeholders have expressed concerns about a proposed restructuring, but management has not consulted them further. Stakeholders ________ accept the proposed changes without more information.

  8. A pacesetting leader has driven the team to deliver exceptional results, but several team members are showing signs of burnout. The leader ________ continue pushing the team at this pace.

  9. Following a series of compliance failures, the new CEO has pledged to rebuild trust with regulators. The company ________ conduct a full review of all compliance procedures.

  10. An affiliative manager has avoided giving critical feedback to a struggling team member for months. The manager ________ have avoided raising these performance issues for so long.

  11. A company’s ethics policy states that employees are free to decline work on projects they find morally objectionable. Employees ________ participate in projects that conflict with their personal ethical values.

  12. A department head has been asked to cut costs by 20%, and one option is to reduce spending on safety training. Compromising on safety training ________ put employees at risk.

  13. The board has announced it will not tolerate any further breaches of the anti-corruption policy. The board ________ accept any further violations of the policy.

  14. Two members of the leadership team have a serious conflict that is affecting the wider organisation. Someone at a senior level ________ intervene before the conflict causes lasting damage to the team.

  15. A visionary leader wants to pivot the entire company towards sustainable energy, but the board is cautious about the financial risk. The board ________ consider the long-term reputational benefits of early investment in sustainability.

  16. A merger is being considered, but the target company has faced allegations of environmental dumping. The merger ________ receive regulatory approval given the allegations.

  17. A responsible organisation has a policy of consulting affected communities before making decisions that impact them. A responsible leader ________ make decisions affecting local communities without consulting them first.

  18. An organisation is expanding into a new market with very different labour laws and cultural norms. The organisation ________ comply with local regulations even when they differ from those at home.

  19. A coaching leader is mentoring a junior manager who lacks confidence in handling difficult conversations. The leader ________ model effective communication techniques during team meetings.

  20. The auditors have found that key financial documents were altered before submission. The auditors ________ verify the accuracy of the original financial statements.

Part 2: Vocabulary and comprehension — ethics and leadership

Reading: The Ethics of Leadership

Culture, values, and decision-making in modern organisations

The words in bold are key vocabulary. You will need to provide definitions of each term in the table on the next page.

Every organisation, whether a multinational corporation or a small startup, develops its own corporate culture — a set of shared values, beliefs, and practices that shape how employees interact, make decisions, and pursue organisational goals. While some companies cultivate cultures of transparency and accountability, others may inadvertently foster environments where ethical shortcuts are tolerated or even encouraged. The culture that takes root in an organisation is not accidental; it reflects the priorities, habits, and standards set by those at the top. Over time, these patterns become deeply embedded, influencing everything from recruitment and promotion to how the organisation responds to crises and external pressure.

Ethical leadership sits at the heart of a healthy corporate culture. Leaders who demonstrate integrity in their decision-making set the tone for the entire organisation. When a CEO prioritises compliance with regulations and treats stakeholders with fairness, employees are more likely to follow suit. Conversely, when leaders turn a blind eye to corruption or bribery, they send a message that ethical standards are negotiable. In extreme cases, a culture of tolerance towards dishonesty can lead to practices such as insider trading, where individuals exploit confidential information for personal gain, causing serious harm to markets and to public trust. History offers numerous examples of organisations that collapsed not because of poor strategy, but because of ethical failures at the leadership level that went unchallenged for too long. Building a culture of integrity requires consistent effort: leaders must not only articulate ethical expectations, but demonstrate them in their own conduct every day.

One of the most challenging aspects of business ethics is navigating ethical dilemmas — situations where there is no clear right answer. Consider a company that discovers its most profitable supplier uses questionable labour practices. Terminating the relationship would demonstrate a commitment to sustainability and corporate social responsibility, but could also result in significant financial losses and potential job cuts. Such dilemmas require careful risk assessment and a willingness to balance competing interests. Leaders may also face a conflict of interest when their personal relationships or financial stakes influence decisions that should be made impartially — for example, awarding a contract to a company owned by a relative. Recognising and declaring conflicts of interest is a fundamental aspect of ethical governance, yet many professionals find it difficult to acknowledge situations where their judgement may be compromised.

Whistleblowers play a vital role in maintaining ethical standards within organisations. These individuals expose wrongdoing at personal risk, often facing retaliation despite legal protections. The most effective organisations establish a code of ethics that encourages employees to report concerns through safe, confidential channels. By fostering an environment where whistleblowing is seen as an act of integrity rather than disloyalty, companies can identify and address problems before they escalate. A strong code of ethics also provides employees with a clear reference point when they encounter grey areas or pressure to act against their principles. Without such a framework, employees may remain silent out of fear, allowing unethical practices to persist and grow. Protecting whistleblowers is therefore not just a legal obligation but a practical necessity for any organisation that takes its ethical commitments seriously.

The concept of due diligence extends beyond financial transactions to encompass ethical considerations. Before entering new markets, forming partnerships, or launching products, responsible organisations conduct thorough assessments of potential ethical risks. This includes evaluating the impact on local communities, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations, and verifying that business partners share similar ethical standards. Without proper due diligence, organisations risk entering into arrangements that expose them to legal liability or reputational damage. The cost of failing to investigate thoroughly is almost always greater than the cost of the investigation itself, as several high-profile corporate scandals in recent years have demonstrated.

Mitigation strategies are essential for managing the ethical risks that inevitably arise in complex business environments. These may include regular ethics training programmes, independent ethics committees, robust internal reporting mechanisms, and transparent communication with all stakeholders. Effective mitigation also requires ongoing monitoring: ethical risks are not static, and the measures designed to address them must evolve as the organisation grows and its operating environment changes. Organisations that invest in these measures not only reduce their exposure to legal and reputational risks but also build stronger relationships with employees, customers, and the wider community.

Ultimately, the most successful organisations recognise that ethical leadership and strong corporate culture are not merely about avoiding scandal — they are competitive advantages that attract talent, build customer loyalty, and create sustainable long-term value. In an era of increasing public scrutiny, social media exposure, and rapid information sharing, the organisations that thrive will be those that treat ethical conduct not as a constraint on profitability, but as a foundation for lasting success.

Key vocabulary: ethics and leadership

Provide definitions of each of the following terms, which appear in bold in the reading text.

Term Definition
Corporate culture
Transparency
Accountability
Ethical leadership
Integrity
Compliance
Stakeholders
Fairness
Corruption
Bribery
Insider trading
Ethical dilemma
Sustainability
Corporate social responsibility
Risk assessment
Conflict of interest
Whistleblower
Code of ethics
Due diligence
Mitigation

Comprehension questions: Section A — multiple choice

  1. According to the text, what sits at the heart of a healthy corporate culture?
    1. Financial performance
    2. Ethical leadership
    3. Marketing strategy
    4. Employee benefits
  2. What message do leaders send when they turn a blind eye to corruption?
    1. That the company is struggling financially
    2. That ethical standards are negotiable
    3. That employees should report concerns
    4. That compliance is a priority
  3. The text describes an ethical dilemma involving:
    1. A profitable supplier with questionable labour practices
    2. A CEO who refuses to follow regulations
    3. An employee who steals company secrets
    4. A marketing campaign that targets children
  4. According to the text, how should organisations view whistleblowing?
    1. As disloyalty
    2. As an act of integrity
    3. As a legal requirement
    4. As unnecessary in ethical companies
  5. What does the text say due diligence should encompass beyond financial transactions?
    1. Marketing research
    2. Ethical considerations
    3. Employee satisfaction surveys
    4. Competitor analysis
  6. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a mitigation strategy?
    1. Regular ethics training programmes
    2. Independent ethics committees
    3. Reducing employee salaries
    4. Transparent communication with stakeholders
  7. What does the text suggest ethical leadership and strong corporate culture ultimately represent?
    1. Legal obligations
    2. Unnecessary expenses
    3. Competitive advantages
    4. Short-term solutions
  8. According to the text, what happens when a CEO prioritises compliance and fairness?
    1. Profits immediately increase
    2. Employees are more likely to follow suit
    3. Competitors become less aggressive
    4. Regulations are relaxed

Section B: True, false, or not given

  1. All multinational corporations have strong ethical cultures.

  2. Whistleblowers often face retaliation despite legal protections.

  3. The text states that ethical dilemmas always have clear solutions.

  4. Due diligence includes evaluating the impact on local communities.

  5. Most companies invest heavily in ethics training programmes.

  6. Organisations that invest in ethical measures build stronger relationships with stakeholders.

  7. The text argues that ethical leadership is more important than financial performance.

Section C: Short answer questions

  1. What two contrasting corporate cultures does the text describe in the opening paragraph?

  2. Explain the ethical dilemma described in the third paragraph and identify the competing interests involved.

  3. How does the text suggest organisations should handle whistleblowing?

  4. What does the text mean by saying ethical leadership creates “sustainable long-term value”?

  5. List three mitigation strategies mentioned in the text for managing ethical risks.

Part 3: Grammar — word forms

Word form table

Complete the table with the appropriate word forms. Put an X if a particular form doesn’t exist.

Noun Verb Adjective Adverb Person
leadership
negotiate
resilient
strategically
mentor
innovation
inclusive
diplomacy
motivate
authentically

Complete the sentence with the correct form

Choose the appropriate form of the word in brackets to complete each sentence.

  1. The CEO’s ______________ (vision/visionary/envision) approach helped the company navigate uncertain market conditions.

  2. Team leaders must learn to ______________ (delegation/delegate/delegated) tasks effectively to avoid burnout.

  3. They managed the crisis ______________ (strategy/strategic/strategically) by focusing on customer retention.

  4. Good ______________ (collaborate/collaboration/collaborative) between departments is essential for project success.

  5. The board ______________ (decision/decide/decisive) to restructure the company after careful consideration.

  6. Her ______________ (innovative/innovation/innovate) leadership style encourages creative thinking.

  7. The manager spoke ______________ (transparent/transparency/transparently) about the challenges ahead.

  8. ______________ (Empowerment/Empower/Empowering) employees leads to higher engagement and productivity.

  9. The team responded ______________ (resilience/resilient/resiliently) to the unexpected setback.

  10. ______________ (Authentic/Authenticity/Authentically) in leadership builds trust among team members.

Case study: leadership styles

Leadership styles

  • Visionary: Inspires and guides with a compelling long-term vision. Best for launching new initiatives or major organisational shifts. Can lack focus on present-day details.
  • Coaching: Develops individuals’ strengths and long-term growth. Best for employees showing potential but needing skill development. Requires time and willingness to accept feedback.
  • Affiliative: Builds harmony, repairs rifts, and provides emotional support. Best for times of stress or crisis when the team needs reassurance. Can prioritise harmony over confronting performance issues.
  • Democratic: Values collective input and builds buy-in through shared decision-making. Best when the leader needs diverse perspectives on complex issues. Can be time-consuming and less effective in crises.
  • Pacesetting: Sets high standards and leads by personal example. Best for highly skilled, motivated teams on short-term urgent projects. Can lead to burnout and a stressful atmosphere.
  • Commanding: Demands compliance through top-down control. Best for genuine emergencies where immediate action is vital. Damages morale and stifles creativity if used routinely.

Instructions

Your group has been assigned one of the cases below. For your case, you should:

  • identify a leadership style you think is most appropriate;
  • explain why that leadership style is most appropriate;
  • provide reasons why that leadership style might backfire;
  • identify which leadership style(s) would be inappropriate.

Case 1: The whistleblower’s dilemma

A junior analyst at a financial services firm has discovered evidence of insider trading by a senior executive. The analyst reported the issue through the company’s confidential whistleblowing channel, but weeks have passed with no response. Other employees have heard rumours about the complaint and the corporate culture has become tense — some colleagues support the analyst, while others accuse them of disloyalty. The analyst’s direct manager must protect the whistleblower, maintain team cohesion, and ensure accountability, all while the internal investigation is still ongoing.

Case 2: Pivoting to sustainability

A mid-sized manufacturing company has built its success on cheap, high-volume production, but a recent risk assessment has revealed significant environmental liabilities. Stakeholders — including investors, regulators, and local communities — are demanding greater corporate social responsibility. The CEO believes the company must pivot towards sustainable practices to survive long-term, but many senior managers see this as an expensive distraction. The CEO needs to inspire the organisation to embrace a fundamentally new strategic direction despite widespread internal resistance.

Case 3: Rebuilding after a corruption scandal

A construction company has been fined heavily after an investigation uncovered systematic bribery of local officials to win contracts. Several senior leaders have been dismissed, and the company’s code of ethics has been exposed as little more than a formality. The new CEO, brought in from outside, must rebuild the company’s integrity and compliance culture from scratch. Employees are demoralised and distrustful, regulators are watching closely, and clients are reconsidering their contracts.

Case 4: The high-pressure product launch

A pharmaceutical company is racing to bring a groundbreaking drug to market before a competitor. The project leader has assembled a cross-functional team of top specialists, but the timeline is extremely aggressive and compliance with regulatory standards is non-negotiable. Due diligence on the clinical trial data must be completed without shortcuts. Several team members have flagged concerns about the pace of work and the risk of errors, but the board is pushing hard for results. The project leader needs to deliver exceptional quality under immense pressure without sacrificing accuracy or burning out the team.

Case 5: Navigating a conflict of interest

A technology company is evaluating a major partnership with a supplier whose CEO is a close friend of the company’s Chief Procurement Officer (CPO). An internal audit has raised transparency concerns, and the board has asked for a thorough ethical review before any deal is signed. The CPO insists the relationship has no bearing on the decision and resists calls for an independent assessment. The company’s managing director must handle this sensitive situation with fairness, ensure proper due diligence is conducted, and maintain trust among all stakeholders — without alienating a valued senior colleague.

Case 6: A crisis of consumer safety

A food production company has received reports that a batch of its products may be contaminated. No illnesses have been confirmed yet, but the risk assessment suggests the contamination could affect thousands of consumers. Information is still emerging, and the company faces urgent decisions about product recalls, public statements, and mitigation measures. The CEO must act swiftly to protect consumers, ensure compliance with safety regulations, and manage the reputational fallout — all while keeping employees informed and focused.